![]() ![]() |
| Forum Home | Electric Guitar | Acoustic Guitar | Bass | Effects | Keys & Synth | Drums & Perc | Software | Computer | Recording/Live Sound | MIDI |
|
|||||||
| Recording Forum Trade studio secrets! Get advice on gear, production, monitoring, mastering, and room design. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6
|
Seeking re-amping advice
Hi all, I'm about to start recording with my band Torpedo Rodeo and I just read online about the process of re-amping. Since I am a huge tone and fx junkie this interests me a whole lot and I was hoping someone with more insight than myself could help answer a few questions:
1. I need a Direct box to go to the board (recording in our home PT studio). Will any old direct box (ie whirlwind EDB1, the cheap one I have access to) work for this purpose? 2. While I record my direct signal, I also want to be able to play through my amp live, to get my tone and feel and such... Can I also use the direct box as the splitting device (since most of them have two outputs)? Can I split the signal without degrading it? 3. Is there a quality difference between the cheapest option I've found for a re-amping box (Radial Pro RMP, $99) and other more expensive ones? Any other advice would be huge. Thanks in advance. We probably won't be ready to record guitars for another two weeks so I am hoping to figure out the gear I need and order it by the beginning of next week. -Max |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 733
|
Maybe somone else can chime in, if I'm wrong... but I think you can use like a Boss tu-2 tuner to correct the impedance when running back into the amp.
I've also had good luck running out of the fx loop, recording, then running back into the fx loop to record the mic. It's not really reamping, you're kind of stuck with the amp's gain and eq settings... but it's good for allowing you to play with mic placement and different cabs. If you're amp has an fx loop. Neither of these is probably as good as having an actual reamp box, but its cheap/free and worth a try if you got the means.
__________________
GUITARS... Brian Moore i8.13, Brian Moore i2.13, Godin Xtsa AMPS... Soldano SL-60, Soldano Semi-Open 2x12 (w/ emi tonker and tone tubby hempcone) Stu-Daddy Fender '65 Deluxe Reverb (w/ celestion gold) Vox AC15tb (w/ celestion gold) http://www.myspace.com/vulcansanvilatx |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
While it works, i've never been able to mix the two signals to a usable result. Using one or the other - it sounds perfectly fine, but combining both the amp and DI signal to try and achieve 'one' sound ultimately just ends up sounding thin, phasey, and generally unpleasant. If you try this and look at the two wav files (of the same performance) in your sequencer, the DI tends to capture all the transients and has a very fast sound, whereas a mic'd up guitar amp is generally a flatter transient response, but is a bit more dynamic due to the guitar/amp interaction. Putting them together - it just sounds wrong, and fine adjustment doesn't fix. I'd save my money if I was you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall of Fame Member
|
Quote:
Basically though I would say it's the transformer they use that makes it cost less. The quality wasn't so much less that the pro rmp isn't a great box though. I personally own a Reamp V.2 and love it, simple and it works. DI boxes do have a huge difference IMO, a cheap behringer doesn't hold water to a nice Radial. Again I would say due to the components not build structure. Most DI boxes that I have seen (even cheap ones) have a low Z out and a high Z out for splitting the signal. There shouldn't be any degradation of the signal when run this way.
__________________
Criteria for being a successful contributor to the HCAF: 1. Must talk like a 4 year old, the more letters you replace the better. Examples would be brootz, failzor, teh, map and other. 2. Must have an extremely closed mind, resort to name calling if necessary. Carrying on normal conversation = "fail". Some other things that are pluses (but not limited to): 1. Alcoholism (big plus). 2. Excessive use of emoticons especially and .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall of Fame Member
|
I will say that running a DI backwards sucks compared to a box designed for re amping.
Things to consider: Keep the instrument cable from the DI box as short as possible. I personally use a little 6" cable. The balanced cable run to the reamp box doesn't really matter as much. Same for the DI box, keep your instrument cable runs as short as possible. If your using two instrument cables treat that as the run and don't go longer than you absolutely have to. Make absolutely sure your DI is not clipping.
__________________
Criteria for being a successful contributor to the HCAF: 1. Must talk like a 4 year old, the more letters you replace the better. Examples would be brootz, failzor, teh, map and other. 2. Must have an extremely closed mind, resort to name calling if necessary. Carrying on normal conversation = "fail". Some other things that are pluses (but not limited to): 1. Alcoholism (big plus). 2. Excessive use of emoticons especially and .
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|