PDA

View Full Version : Kodak printers


nice keetee
03-30-2008, 07:29 PM
Anyone try a new Kodak printer that uses WAYYYYYYY cheaper ink? or so I've read.

nice keetee
04-01-2008, 09:09 PM
Bump. Anyone here print their own pics etc?

Dr Sunshine
04-02-2008, 02:26 PM
no i havent.

jennyankles
04-03-2008, 08:16 AM
it's easier to have kodak print them. it's only around 15 cents each

John S. Shinal
04-03-2008, 10:42 AM
Anyone try a new Kodak printer that uses WAYYYYYYY cheaper ink? or so I've read.

I buy printers to support users in our workplace, and have been using the Canon PIXMA series (like the iP4500) for quite a while due to the lower ink costs compared to HPs. Overall the Canons have been great.

I'm also interested in the Kodaks, but haven't tried them yet. What I heard was that they CONSUMED a lot less ink than the others. Bottom line is Kodak claims lower per-page costs.

nice keetee
04-04-2008, 08:01 PM
I buy printers to support users in our workplace, and have been using the Canon PIXMA series (like the iP4500) for quite a while due to the lower ink costs compared to HPs. Overall the Canons have been great.

I'm also interested in the Kodaks, but haven't tried them yet. What I heard was that they CONSUMED a lot less ink than the others. Bottom line is Kodak claims lower per-page costs.

Interesting an iMac is being bundled with a Pixma on ? website for good price. Anyway I take lots of pics and unless I want to spend even at 15 pfennig per, 1k of pics will cost $150 de-valuaed greenbacks to find I like 10?...Or check out on monitor and decide and put on media to have lab or print at home unless need quality enlargement and if it's 3 am I can :blah::blah::blah: Only place I've seen Kodak printers was for sale around the Christian holiday of Christmas on a television shop deal. Kodak has been hurting since the shift from film to digital. Maybe the new low use etc printers have other bugs?

John S. Shinal
04-07-2008, 09:02 AM
I only saw the Kodaks advertised then also. I will note that if you use the Canon with an "archival" photo paper the inks remain very stable like a chemical print. A friend of mine prefers NCR paper, but it's hard to find. I will say the redering from the Canon photo inks is very impressive. The photographers I know who are extremely picky all use a high-end Epson stylus model though - it's NOT the normally seen consumer models - about $1000 and requires a proper calibration to render true colors.

We've purchased lots of the Pixmas (100s), with very few problems, and reasonable ink costs.

nice keetee
04-09-2008, 10:36 PM
Danke for the replies :wave: